Greatest Hits: Mass Transit Musings II
Less With More: Randal O'Toole has noted that "since 1970, the number of workers needed to operate America's public transit systems has increased by 180%."
Meanwhile, "ridership on buses, trolley buses, light rail, and heavy rail (again, the only modes shown in 1970), grew by a mere 32%. That means each transit worker produced 53,115 transit trips in 1970, but only 26,314 trips by all modes in 2008. In other words, by any measure, transit productivity has declined by more than 50%."
"About the only other industry that has seen a similar loss in productivity during the same time period is education - which, like transit, is government-run."
Government enterprise - a stunning example of reverse productivity. (posted 7/22/10, permalink)
Wrong Side Of The Tracks: For as long as I can remember, Northwest Portland has been the artsy and gay district. It is a pleasant section of town filled with mature tree cover, trendy restaurants, galleries and small shops. Parking has always been at a premium due to skinny streets and a plethora of visitors.
Several years ago, Portland decided to run a streetcar line through the narrow NW streets. The streetcar swings west from the Pearl District on NW Northrup St., then south on NW 23rd, passing Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital. Then it turns east on NW Lovejoy, heading back to the Pearl and, eventually, Portland State University.
During a recent hospital visit, I had a chance to see the chaos wrought by Portland's mass transit obsession. The track makes very wide swings, knocking out a bunch of parking at every quarter turn. Every trolley stop has a shelter and landing, eliminating even more parking spaces. The streets are narrow and the trolley takes up more than half the street. Why the track radius is so large in difficult to understand; while the Skoda streetcars are quite long - 66 feet, they are double articulated and should be able to navigate extremely tight-radius curves.
During our entire time in the area, including exposure at peak commuting hours, I never saw an actual streetcar. I had the same experience when we last visited the Pearl District. It makes me wonder if TriMet actually runs any of the damn things or if they laid track just to screw up parking in an attempt to further the agency's anti-car agenda.
The old PCC trolley cars of the 1930s were 46 feet long and had swivel trucks which allowed for tight turns even on the narrow lanes of South Philadelphia, the Bronx, Baltimore and old Boston. And, for those really close quarters, there were always Birney cars - nimble little trolleys which could turn on the proverbial dime.
TriMet's railcar madness is spreading like a fast-growing cancer, killing everything that's good in the River City. I'm glad I don't live in Portland. (posted 7/12/10, permalink)
Export Market: Light rail exports crime to new neighborhoods.
The Clackamas County (OR) sheriff has said he's concerned the new MAX line is dropping off "more than passengers at Clackamas Town Center; it's dropping off crime too. In the five months since the MAX Green line first arrived, Sheriff Craig Roberts says crime in the surrounding area is up 32% this year and calls for service are up 56% compared to 2009."
I remember when Gresham was a nice, sleepy little town east of Portland. Then TriMet came along and killed the neighborhood.
Before the light-rail line opened in 1986, Gresham was "a neighborhood of well-maintained owner-occupied single-family residences." The light-rail line "split the area in two and messed up the traffic at two of the major intersections, one of which was the location of the Fred Meyer store. Then the New Urbanist mayor of Gresham pushed through a policy to encourage the construction of hundreds and hundreds of low-cost government-supported apartments amid the owner-occupied homes." That policy included rezoning the neighborhood for minimum-density apartments and providing below-market land sales and tax-increment financed subsidies to those apartments.
"Instead of attracting yuppies looking for walkable neighborhoods, the apartments drew low-income families displaced from Portland neighborhoods that were being gentrified by people who - thanks to the urban-growth boundary - could not find affordable single-family homes elsewhere. The light rail brought in drug dealers and other shady characters. Soon the neighborhood was controlled by gangs and residents were afraid to ride the light rail because of the threat of violence."
No light rail for Clark County, WA. We have enough crime already, thank you. (posted 6/11/10, permalink)
Less Tax Money = Less Waste: I've written before about the many sightings of C-Tran running mostly-empty buses on routes throughout the area. Now there will be fewer of them.
"Clark County's bus system is cutting back on low-ridership routes starting in January to help close a $6 million budget gap caused by the recession." Why? "Sales taxes make up 60 percent of the system's operating budget, but have fallen because of the prolonged downturn." (posted 10/23/09, permalink)
This Is Urban Planning? The newly opened Seattle-area Sound Transit light-rail line has no park-and-ride lots or garages. Street parking varies severely-restricted to nonexistent. If you live in the area, maybe you should plan on building your own personal light rail line to get from home to a Sound Transit rail stop.
When asked, Seattle DOT smugly replied that people should take a bus to the station.
For years, the city of Seattle has had a policy of discouraging park-and-rides. Garages, said Rick Sheridan, spokesman for the Seattle Department of Transportation, "create traffic and don't add to the quality of life of a neighborhood."
Of course, bums and beggars don't add to a neighborhood's "quality of life" either but Seattle openly encourages growth of its ever-increasing homeless population. (posted 7/24/09, permalink)
Money-Burning Mass Transit: Testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs (chaired by that money-wasting, reprehensible Christopher Dodd), Randal O'Toole, the Antiplanner, noted that, "despite increasing transit subsidies by 1,250% (adjusted for inflation) since 1970, transit travel has declined from 49 to 45 trips per urban resident and transit's share of urban travel has declined from 4.0% to 1.6%."
He continued, "In a very real sense, transit is just like the British coal, rail, and other nationalized industries in the 1960s: its main purpose is no longer transportation but to meet other political goals such as keeping transit workers employed and construction contracts going to transit builders. If transit were private, no one would argue that we have to make the world less convenient and more expensive for the 95% of people who travel by car so that it will be more convenient for the 1 or 2 percent who travel by transit."
Mass Transit is a lie. It's not for the masses. It's for a select few. And a colossal waste of taxpayer dollars. (posted 7/13/09, permalink)
Your Tax Dollars At Waste ... Again: C-Tran, Clark County's transit agency, received $5.8 million through federal economic stimulus funding. The money will enable the agency to purchase three new hybrid buses and 12 new minivans, as well as pay for assorted upgrades to communications and maintenance for its existing fleet of 110 buses and 67 C-Van paratransit vehicles.
These 177 vehicles are the ones I see cruising around Vancouver with one or two passengers in them.
C-Tran spokesman Scott Patterson said. "We are experiencing a serious downturn in revenue." In other words, nobody's riding the buses already on the road. So, why is our tax money being used to buy more?
The grant is one of 343 totalling $3.2 billion to improve public transit across the country. The Federal Transit Administration expects to award another $5.2 billion worth of transit grants through the end of the year. (posted 7/13/09, permalink)
Mass Energy Waste: Randal O'Toole, the Antiplanner, has written, "Public transit buses tend to be some the least energy-efficient vehicles around because agencies tend to buy really big buses (why not? The feds pay for them), and they run around empty much of the time. But private intercity buses are some of the most energy efficient vehicles because the private operators have an incentive to fill them up." Think Greyhound, Trailways, Coach USA, etc.
Randal reported, "When it comes to energy consumption per passenger mile, the real waste is generated by public transit agencies and Amtrak. Instead of trying to fill seats, they are politically driven to provide service to all taxpayers, regardless of population density or demand."
Every time I see a C-Tran bus around here, it is more than 90% empty.
"Meanwhile, transit agencies build light-rail lines to wealthy suburbs with three cars in every garage. With capacities of more than 170, the average light-rail car in Baltimore and Denver carries less than 15 people, while San Jose’s carries 16. For that we need to spend $40 million a mile on track and $3 million per railcar vs. $300,000 for a bus. ... The environmental impact statement for a Portland, Oregon light-rail line found it would take 171 years of annual energy savings to repay the energy cost of construction." But they built it anyway.

The article concludes, "If we really wanted to save energy, we would privatize transit, privatize Amtrak and sell highways to private entrepreneurs who would have an incentive to reduce the congestion that wastes nearly 3 billion gallons of fuel each year. But of course, the real goal of the rail people is not to save energy but to reshape American lifestyles. They just can't stand to see people enjoying the freedom of being able to go where they want, when they want to get there."
Maybe if buses and railcars were covered with mirrors, they could be solar-powered. No service at night or on cloudy days, though. (posted 6/29/09, permalink)
Department Of Transportation = Department Of Mass Transit: At a National Press Club speech intended to promote the Department of Transportation's (DOT) stimulus spending initiatives, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood explained how his policies are designed to discourage the ownership and use of automobiles. Although many imagine road building when 'shovel-ready' projects are mentioned, the only efforts highlighted by LaHood as worthy of receiving federal taxpayer subsidy include buses, light rail and other forms of multi-modal transit.
"We have $8 billion," LaHood said. "You're going to see new buses; you're going to see ability of transit districts to really have the equipment ... And we'll begin at DOT to set a standard for our ability to get out of the recession, get people back to work in good-paying jobs."
LaHood says some of those federally-funded jobs involve driving buses. I don't know if he means big buses or a bunch of aging hippies driving old VW Microbuses around Eugene, OR, Portland's Pearl District and Bellingham, WA.
Mass transit almost never works. I've posted extensively about the folly of public transit here and on this web page.
It's your tax dollars at waste. (posted 5/28/09, permalink)
Bad Idea: Washington state and California officials have held preliminary discussions about a high-speed, state-of-the-art rail line that would connect San Diego and Vancouver, B.C., with trains that could travel in excess of 200 miles per hour. "The 1,500-mile line, by some estimates, could cost between $10 million and $45 million per mile to build." That could be almost $70 billion dollars. Constructing a truly high-speed West Coast rail corridor wouldn't be easy, requiring entirely new rails and a new corridor that smoothed out grades and corners.
At present, passenger trains share the tracks with freight trains on a BNSF mainline, and sometimes must wait because of track tie-ups. The Amtrack Cascades between Eugene, OR, and Seattle averaged a 64% on-time performance for 2008. (posted 5/20/09, permalink)
Almost Eighty Years Later; Almost Eighty Percent Uglier: In 1931, new railcars were introduced on the Philadelphia to Norristown transit line. The railway was then known as the Pennsylvania & Western (nicknamed the Piss & Whistle by locals); the new cars were built by Brill of Philadelphia.
The aluminum railcars had a streamlined design (resulting from wind-tunnel testing of scale models), featured rounded parabolic ends and could hit speeds as high as 92 mph. These amazing cars remained in service for 59 years. I rode them many times commuting to college. The replacement cars are Fisher-Price boxy and probably have the aerodynamics of a brick.

The line on which the new cars run is now controlled by SEPTA and is known as the Norristown High-Speed Line. So much for progress. (posted 4/6/09, permalink)
Fiscal Levitation: Buried in the details of the mass transit section of the recently-passed and signed Spendulus Package (aka - No Deadbeat Left Behind) is $45 million to pay for environmental studies of a Disneyland to Las Vegas high-speed MagLev rail line, something that sounds like parody but is actually a pet project of Harry Reid, Democratic Senate Majority Leader. The 311-mph train could make the trip from Sin City to Tomorrowland in less than two hours, according to backers - at a cost of mega-billions.

Maglev costs about 10 times as much as regular rail. There's only one commercial maglev line in the world - the Shanghai Transrapid which travels from Pudong, on the Shanghai subway line to Pudong International Airport - a distance of less than 19 miles. There has never been a commercial long distance inter-city maglev rail line built.
The Shanghai maglev cost $1.33 billion to build. So the construction cost alone would be $70 million per mile (and that's with Chinese labor). Constructing a line from Disneyland to Las Vegas - a distance of almost 300 miles - would surely cost well over 20 billion dollars. This is an absurdly high number. And, in America - a large country with big distances between population centers - passenger rail never pays off.
The heyday of rail passenger service in America was in the 1920s. In those times, railroads were profitable and passengers were happy. The depression of the 1930s ended all that. The Pennsylvania Railroad's experience was typical. Like the rest of the nation's railroads, the Pennsy never earned a profit from passenger service since 1946, despite multi-million dollar investments in passenger equipment and facilities in the years following World War II. Competition from the use of automobiles for medium-distance intercity trips prevented the railroads from increasing fares enough to cover soaring labor and material costs.
Today, even in the densely Northeast Corridor, Amtrak can't make money. Not even with its high-speed, premium priced Acela trains. Since its inception in 1971, Amtrak has never recorded a profit while receiving more than $40 billion in federal funding since its inception.
Amtrak's annual operating deficit for the entire system is approximately $500 million dollars. The rest of Amtrak's deficit goes to debt service, capital projects on the Amtrak-owned Northeast Corridor infrastructure and Railroad Retirement costs.
Amtrak started Acela high-speed train service in late 2000. Each train can make the trip between New York and Washington in 2 hours, 28 minutes, with a top speed of 150 mph. Revenue from Acela fares was $403.5 million, or 27 percent of Amtrak's ticket sales. Acela tickets can be more than twice as expensive as those for slower, so-called regional trains between Washington and New York. Trains out of New York City account for over 60% of Amtrak's gross revenue.
In the 1940s to the 1960s, the Pennsylvania Railroad ran 'clockers' - hourly trains (22 per day, over 150 per week) between Philadelphia and New York; single electric locomotives carrying eight to ten passenger cars. Acela trains have two locomotives and six passenger cars; there are only 32 scheduled Acela runs per week.
Last year, Republican Senator John E. Sununu New Hampshire offered an amendment that would have forbidden Amtrak from running trains with government per-passenger subsidies that exceed $200. He asked, "How much money should the taxpayers be asked to spend on a business that is losing money?" His proposal was voted down by a wide margin in the Democrat-controlled Congress.
Passenger railroads in Japan and Great Britain are now mostly in private hands and are generally profitable.
Creating new rail networks will not solve America's woes - it will only create another unprofitable quasi-government entity. Privatization would weed out the unprofitable routes and maintain/create profitable, market-based transportation entities. (posted 3/30/09, permalink)
More mass transit musings can be found here.
|
|
Disclaimer
The facts presented in this blog are based on my best guesses and my substantially faulty geezer memory. The opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the author and are protected by the U.S. Constitution. Probably.
Spelling, punctuation and syntax errors are cheerfully repaired when I find them; grudgingly fixed when you do.
If I have slandered any brands of automobiles, either expressly or inadvertently, they're most likely crap cars and deserve it. Automobile manufacturers should be aware that they always have the option of giving me free cars to try and change my mind.
If I have slandered any people or corporations in this blog, either expressly or inadvertently, they should buy me strong drinks (and an expensive meal) and try to prove to me that they're not the jerks I've portrayed them to be. If you're buying, I'm willing to listen.
Don't be shy - try a bribe. It might help.
|
|